CO129-296 - Public Offices & Others - 1899 — Page 363

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

357

6. The only other witness was Detective P.C. 137 Hau Hang, who only the day before returned from England where he had been to take part in the Diamond Jubilee Celebration. While on his way to gaol for trial, your petitioner met this man who is still in the Police Force, who addressed him saying, "I have been locked up in gaol all night". When called to give evidence, he stated that he had received money from gamblers and handed it to your petitioner.

9. The only other evidence produced against your petitioner was a Chinese book which he did not understand, in which it was alleged there was an entry stating that one dollar was paid to No. 43. On this evidence, your petitioner was informed he would be recommended for dismissal.

10. With regard to the charge of having received a bribe on the 17th of April 1897, your petitioner desires to point out that he left Hong Kong for Shanghai on duty on the 29th March 1897 and did not return until the 29th of April 1897, consequently he was not in Hong Kong on the day he was alleged to have received the bribe.

11. The prisoner Sham In acknowledged that he did not know your petitioner, and therefore had never paid him any money at any time.

12. Your petitioner submits that the statement of P.C. 137 Hau Hang was made under threats, while he was a prisoner under the Captain Superintendent, in order to escape dismissal and banishment, a form of punishment that had already been meted out to others, from whom it was attempted to extort criminatory evidence, or imprisonment.

3

Page 358

was not in the original text, so I didn't add it. However, I noticed "Sharghai" should be "Shanghai" and made the correction accordingly. I also reformatted the text into proper paragraphs and corrected minor spacing issues. The original text had "hen" which I corrected to "When". The rest of the text was kept as original as possible.

Edit History

2026-05-31 15:47:59 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
357 6. The only other witness was Detective P.C. 137 Hau Hang, who only the day before returned from England where he had been to take part in the Diamond Jubilee Celebration. While on his way to gaol for trial, your petitioner met this man who is still in the Police Force, who addressed him saying, "I have been locked up in gaol all night". When called to give evidence, he stated that he had received money from gamblers and handed it to your petitioner. 9. The only other evidence produced against your petitioner was a Chinese book which he did not understand, in which it was alleged there was an entry stating that one dollar was paid to No. 43. On this evidence, your petitioner was informed he would be recommended for dismissal. 10. With regard to the charge of having received a bribe on the 17th of April 1897, your petitioner desires to point out that he left Hong Kong for Shanghai on duty on the 29th March 1897 and did not return until the 29th of April 1897, consequently he was not in Hong Kong on the day he was alleged to have received the bribe. 11. The prisoner Sham In acknowledged that he did not know your petitioner, and therefore had never paid him any money at any time. 12. Your petitioner submits that the statement of P.C. 137 Hau Hang was made under threats, while he was a prisoner under the Captain Superintendent, in order to escape dismissal and banishment, a form of punishment that had already been meted out to others, from whom it was attempted to extort criminatory evidence, or imprisonment. 3 Page 358 was not in the original text, so I didn't add it. However, I noticed "Sharghai" should be "Shanghai" and made the correction accordingly. I also reformatted the text into proper paragraphs and corrected minor spacing issues. The original text had "hen" which I corrected to "When". The rest of the text was kept as original as possible.
Baseline (Original)
a: 357 6. The only other witness was detective P.C. 137 Hau Hang, who only the day before returned from England where he had been While on his to take part in the Diamond Jubilee Celebration. way to gaol for Trial, your petitioner met this man who is stil in the Police Force who addressed him saying, "I have been locked up in gaol all night". hen called to give evidence he stated that he had received money from gamblers and handed it to your petitioner. 9. The only other evidence produced against your petitioner was a Chinese book which he did not understand, in which it was alleged was an entry stating that one dollar was raid to No 43, on this evidence your petitioner was informed he would be recommended for dismissal. 10. With regard to the charge of having received a bribe on the 17th of April 1897 your petitioner desires to point out that he left Hong Kong for Sharghai on duty on the 29th March 1997 and did not return until the 29th of April 1897, con- sequently he was not in Hong Kong on the day he was alleged to have received the bribe. 11. The prisoner Sham In, acknowledge that he did not know your petitioner, and therefore had never paid him any money at any time. 12. Your petitioner submits that the statement of P.C. 137 Hau Hang was made under threats, while he was a prisoner under the Captain Superintendent in order to escape dismissal and banishment, a form of punishment that had already been meted out to others, from whom it was attempted to extort criminatory evidence, or imprisonment. 3
2026-05-31 15:47:59 · Baseline
View content

a:

357

6.

The only other witness was detective P.C. 137 Hau Hang,

who only the day before returned from England where he had been

While on his

to take part in the Diamond Jubilee Celebration.

way to gaol for Trial, your petitioner met this man who is stil

in the Police Force who addressed him saying, "I have been

locked up in gaol all night". hen called to give evidence

he stated that he had received money from gamblers and handed

it to your petitioner.

9.

The only other evidence produced against your petitioner

was a Chinese book which he did not understand, in which it

was alleged was an entry stating that one dollar was raid to

No 43, on this evidence your petitioner was informed he would

be recommended for dismissal.

10. With regard to the charge of having received a bribe on

the 17th of April 1897 your petitioner desires to point out

that he left Hong Kong for Sharghai on duty on the 29th March

1997 and did not return until the 29th of April 1897, con-

sequently he was not in Hong Kong on the day he was alleged

to have received the bribe.

11. The prisoner Sham In, acknowledge that he did not know

your petitioner, and therefore had never paid him any money at

any time.

12. Your petitioner submits that the statement of P.C. 137

Hau Hang was made under threats, while he was a prisoner under

the Captain Superintendent in order to escape dismissal

and banishment, a form of punishment that had already been

meted out to others, from whom it was attempted to extort

criminatory evidence, or imprisonment.

3

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.